<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Ethics on til.io / jesse tolj</title>
    <link>https://til.io/tags/ethics/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Ethics on til.io / jesse tolj</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 08:53:32 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://til.io/tags/ethics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Ethics of Generative AI</title>
      <link>https://til.io/posts/2026/05/29/ethics-of-using-llms/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 08:53:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid>https://til.io/posts/2026/05/29/ethics-of-using-llms/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The other month I wrote more generally about &lt;a href=&#34;https://til.io/posts/2026/03/16/how-im-navigating-an-uncertain-future/&#34;&gt;how I&amp;rsquo;m navigating AI hype and an&#xA;uncertain future&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I fell into the trap that a lot of these &amp;ldquo;my take on LLMs&amp;rdquo; posts do and I&#xA;didn&amp;rsquo;t touch on ethics there. In retrospect, I should have written this one&#xA;first. I will go back and link it at the top of the previous one.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Let me preface this by saying that I think you can make a strong argument that&#xA;any use of generative AI is inherently unethical. I actually agree with this&#xA;take, even though I do use LLMs in some very specific and intentional ways.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
